Posted in News Blog: Current Events

ANTIFA Protestors Turn Violent Outside President Trump’s Minneapolis Rally Tonight

antifa scum trump rally

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6093893475001/

“I’ve never seen such hypocrisy in all my life. … This approach toward anarchy continues to run amok. We cannot afford that in the greatest democracy on Earth.”

The intolerant left. The scum of our society ‘sickens my stomach,’ U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., says

U.S. Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., blasted the hundreds of protesters outside President Trump‘s Minneapolis rally on Thursday night, accusing the raucous crowd of trying to intimidate everyday citizens.

“It’s the most ridiculous thing I saw on TV today,” Scott told guest host Jason Chaffetz on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle.”

“I’ve spent the day today running around South Carolina thanking law enforcement officers — from Charleston to Aiken to Hilton Head — thanking them for their service to this country.

Watching this situation in Minnesota just sickens my stomach.”

Scott, a Republican who has served in the Senate since 2013, praised Minneapolis police for trying to quell the burgeoning crowd of angry demonstrators.

He said the protesters were trying to incite violence and antagonize law enforcement. Protesters at one point appeared to block vehicles trying to leave a parking lot near the Target Center, the downtown sports arena where the rally was held.

antifa scum attack trump supporters at rally

Scott said those same protesters — who were yelling at police and Trump supporters — were the same people telling the president to “calm down.”

“I’ve never seen such hypocrisy in all my life,” he said, adding he had heard recently from a man who was reportedly accosted in New York for wearing a MAGA hat.

Civilians, he said, are “consistently being intimidated” and are being asked to “cower” to what he characterized as a “new, socialist regime.”

“This approach toward anarchy continues to run amok. We cannot afford that in the greatest democracy on Earth.”

“I’ve never seen such hypocrisy in all my life. … This approach toward anarchy continues to run amok. We cannot afford that in the greatest democracy on Earth.”

ANTIFA scum
Posted in News Blog: Current Events

Resolution Introduced In House To Expel Nancy Pelosi

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., talks to reporters during her weekly news conference, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 7, 2018. After several questions about President Donald Trump and his policies, Pelosi responded: The President said he was going to drain the swamp. He has become the swamp. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Rep. Ralph Abraham (R-LA) has introduced a resolution to expel Pelosi from the House.

House Democrats may be trying to ram through impeachment in secret with an anonymous whistleblower. 

But although Republicans are outnumbered in the House, they are fighting back. 

First, they filed a resolution to censure Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA). The resolution has 61 co-sponsors at last count, with prominent names including the House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA).

Now, they’re also fighting back against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) who allowed this travesty to get so far. 

Rep. Ralph Abraham (R-LA) has introduced a resolution to expel Pelosi from the House. 

From Fox News: 

“Nancy Pelosi’s vicious crusade against our lawfully-elected President is nothing more than a politically-motivated witch hunt and it must be stopped,” Abraham said in a statement. “She has disgraced the people’s House and weaponized the Speaker’s gavel for her party’s political gain.”

Abraham added: “House Democrats spent nearly three years obsessed with election meddling only to dwarf any such efforts with their own deceitful plan to nullify the 2016 election and prevent President Trump from winning in 2020. I have introduced a resolution calling for her to be expelled from the House and for the Speaker’s Office to be vacated.”

The White House is fighting back as well. 

They refused to let the U.S. EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland testify before a House panel and they sent a stern letter back to the House, making it clear they regarded the inquiry as illegitimate and unconstitutional.

“I would love to send Ambassador Sondland, a really good man and great American, to testify, but unfortunately he would be testifying before a totally compromised kangaroo court, where Republican’s rights have been taken away, and true facts are not allowed out for the public to see,” Trump wrote on Twitter. ….

@AdamSchiff of course immediately claimed the refusal constituted obstruction. 

But Trump chastised Democrats calling what they were doing to the country “unthinkable.” 

“It’s lucky that I’m the president,” he declared. “A lot of people said very few people could handle it. I sort of thrive on it,” Trump said Monday at the White House. “You can’t impeach a president for doing a great job. This is a scam.”

It’s about damn time the GOP is fighting back @savecalifornianow

Posted in News Blog: Current Events

Here’s How Much the ‘Whistleblower’ Really Knew About Trump’s Phone Call Succinct analysis puts a complicated story — and Pelosi’s Crazed claims

deep state recall Gavin Newsome save California impeachment Trump

The “whistleblower,” it turns out, never heard Trump’s call himself/herself and is relying ONLY on reports from others.

Brit Hume, a longtime political reporter and currently a senior political analyst for the Fox News Channel, summed up exactly what’s going on in terms of the so-called whistleblower who has ignited a firestorm on Capitol Hill — and who may or may not know what President Donald Trump said on the phone to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky back in late July of this year.

That scenario raises far more questions than Democratic members of Congress are willing to admit — but one that Republicans have reminded them of and will, repeatedly.

It raises questions about who those “reporters” of Trump’s phone call might be, what their political leaning is, exactly (one can imagine), and how and under what circumstances they fed information to the “whistleblower.”The “whistleblower,” it turns out, never heard Trump’s call himself/herself and is relying only on reports from others.

Hume sent out a tweet yesterday that nails what’s going on. Check out his message here:

“As of Wednesday morning, when the Ukraine phone call transcript was released, the public knew more about what transpired on the call than the whistleblower knew when he/she filed the complaint.”

That’s right. Trump released the transcript of his phone call — which had been protected by executive privilege — in the interest of being transparent.

The “whistleblower,” it turns out, never heard Trump’s call himself/herself and is relying only on reports from others.

Yet Democrats are seizing on it and interpreting it as they choose to and as they see fit.

Now, an unnamed Ukrainian official said Kiev was not made aware the U.S. had suspended security funds until a month after Trump’s call with Zelensky, which raises questions about the whistleblower’s account and Democrats’ vehement arguments that there was a quid pro quo for such aid, as Fox News pointed out in a new piece.

The official told The New York Times, as Fox News noted, that Zelensky’s administration was unaware of the aid issue until a month after Trump’s July 25 phone call in which he discussed Joe Biden and Biden’s son, Hunter.

“The whistleblower complaint — citing U.S. officials — claimed that officials in Kiev knew that the military aid could be in jeopardy in early August, but the whistleblower admitted to not knowing ‘how or when they learned of it,’” as Fox News noted.

Zelensky said this week in New York City, during a joint press conference with Trump, that he never felt pressured to investigate the Bidens.

Yet Democrats are seizing on it and interpreting it as they choose to and as they see fit.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) began a new push in the House toward impeachment proceedings this week — saying on Thursday that she’s being “prayerful” about it — but Democrats are not holding a roll call vote to authorize the effort.

She also accused Trump and his administration of a “cover-up.”

Meanwhile, Democratic members of the progressive “squad” want Trump out of office now — raising questions about whether Pelosi is indeed being pushed by some of the most Left-leaning members of the House. Members of Congress are about to head home to their congressional districts for the next two weeks — during which they’ll be making the case to constituents for the immediate removal of Trump, even though he was elected by the American people.

The squad has power, left-leaning media outlets claim — for “when they speak, everybody listens,” according to a piece in The New York Times recently.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), for one, argued the recently released transcript of Trump’s phone call with the Ukraine president indicated the conversation was “worse than we thought” — and she accused the president of betraying the nation.

“I think we have to hold this president accountable,” she told reporters, “and protect our democracy.”

She also said, “I’m pretty confidence that we are not going to see this process dragged along,” noting she’s expecting swift action.

Here’s her recent tweet on the issue: THE CLOWN IDIOT SHE IS AND HER STUPID DRIBBLE

That scenario raises far more questions than Democratic members of Congress are willing to admit — but one that Republicans have reminded them of and will, repeatedly.It raises questions about who those “reporters” of Trump’s phone call might be, what their political leaning is, exactly (one can imagine), and how and under what circumstances they fed information to the “whistleblower.”

“Either the president does not know the weight of his words or he does not care about ethics or his constitutional responsibilities,” she also said in a statement on Wednesday obtained and shared by Fox News.

“The transcript and the Justice Department’s acting in a rogue fashion in being complicit in the president’s lawlessness confirm the need for an impeachment inquiry. Clearly, the Congress must act.”

But that’s not all. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) joined Ocasio-Cortez in calling for Trump’s impeachment, saying the transcript alone was proof Congress should pursue the process.

Yet neither of them mention the questionable dealings of former Vice President Joe Biden regarding his role in having a prosecutor fired — someone who was looking into corruption in Ukraine.

Joe Biden acknowledged last year on camera that, when he was vice president, he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings — where Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s son, was on the board.

Shokin himself had separately been accused of corruption.

 WHERE IS THE INVESTIGATION OF THAT — AS TRUMP’S PERSONAL LAWYER RUDY GIULIANI AND OTHERS HAVE WONDERED?

All of this is why it’s no surprise that Trump on Thursday morning called the current investigation “another witch hunt … Really a disgrace, a terrible thing for our country”?

THE GOP NEEDS TO GET OFF THEIR ASS AND FIGHT FOR THIS POTUS

Posted in News Blog: Current Events

Breaking: Adam Schiff Knew About Whistleblower Complaint In AUGUST And Decided To Stay Quiet

According to recently revealed evidence, far-left Democratic congressman Adam Schiff knew about the bogus “whistleblower” accusations that started the impeachment inquiry into President Trump back in August but didn’t start to aggressively go after the President until late September. Was this all planned out?

“Trump is withholding vital military aid to Ukraine, while his personal lawyer seeks help from the Ukraine government to investigate his political opponent. It doesn’t take a stable genius to see the magnitude of this conflict. Or how destructive it is to our national security,” he said in a tweet posted on August 28th

Not only was this comment completely false considering the recently released transcripts of the call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky show no mention of military aid with a Biden investigation in return, but it also raises the question, has Schiff and other congressional Democrats been working with the politically biased whistleblower this entire time?Investigative reporter Paul Sperry reveals what may be going on behind the scenes.

Fred Fleitz, a former CIA officer and National Security Agency Chief of Staff also thinks something fishy is going on, saying that he thinks the whistleblower was helped by House Democrats in crafting his complaint.

Fleitz recently suggested that the complaint is too well written and seems to go along very similar with the far-left, Democratic agenda.

“This document looks as if this leaker had outside help, possibly from congressional members or staff,” he said.

He later added that the complaint, “appears to be written by a law professor.”

Fleitz also explains that he feels “troubled” by the whole whistleblower situation. “I am troubled by the complaint and wonder how an intelligence officer could file it over something a president said to a foreign leader. How could this be an intelligence matter?” Fleitz wrote in an op-ed.

“It appears likely to me that this so-called whistleblower was pursuing a political agenda.”

The former CIA officer continues by saying that he is “very familiar with transcripts of presidential phone calls since I edited and processed dozens of them when I worked for the NSC. I also know a lot about intelligence whistleblowers from my time with the CIA.”

“From my experience, such an extremely polished whistleblowing complaint is unheard of.”

Fleitz continues by saying he thinks it’s “more than a coincidence that this complaint surfaced and was directed to the House Intelligence Committee just after Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), an outspoken opponent of Trump, expressed numerous complaints in August 2019 accusing the President of abusing aid to Ukraine to hurt Joe Biden.”

He adds that he finds it very ironic that the whistleblowers complaint is very similar to a tweet made by Rep. Adam Schiff in late August which read, “House Republicans need to ask the whistleblower under oath whether he spoke to the press or Congress about his complaint.”

Fleitz thinks the entire Ukraine situation is a political plan made up by the Democratic party.

“I refuse to believe that the leaking, timing and presentation of this complaint is coincidence. I don’t think the American people will buy this either.”

Click Here for Article https://trendingpolitics.com/user/collinrugg-192/

Posted in SaveCali

Recall Gavin Newsome: Petition Approved

Secretary of State Approved Petition and Available for Download Now

RECALL OF CALIFORNIA’S EXECUTIVE BRANCH

The officials who have received recall notices are:

  1. Gavin Newsom – Governor. Served
  2. Eleni Kounalakis – Lt Governor. Not Yet Served
  3. Alex Padilla – Secretary of State. Not Yet Served
  4. Xavier Becerra – Attorney General. Not Yet Served
  5. Betty Yee – State Controller. Not Yet Served
  6. Fiona Ma – Treasurer. Not Yet Served
  7. Ricardo Lara – Insurance Commissioner. Not Yet Served

RECALL – Current Status

James Veltmeyer served Gavin Newsom  the first Notice of Intent to Recall on August 5, 2019 which was rejected. James Veltmeyer served Gavin Newsom a second Notice of Intent to Recall on August 26, 2019. The Notice of Intent to recall was verified and the Petition to Recall Gavin Newsom approved on September 27, 2019 .

Download Here