Posted in News Blog: Current Events

House Democrats Released Their ‘Impeachment Resolution’ and It’s Absolute Garbage

Adam Schiff Clown Show Democrat Impeachment
Clown Show Schiff

These Democratic Corrupt Politicians WIll Not Impeach Our POTUS In Secret!

House Democrats released their “impeachment resolution” today, which purports to lay out fair rules involving the ongoing “impeachment inquiry.” The weird thing is seeing some “conservatives” run to Twitter to frame this move by Democrats as calling a Republican bluff. As you’ll see, it does nothing of the sort.

I’m not going to go through the entire thing, as it’s eight pages long, but you can reference it in its full length here. You only need to see a few parts of it to realize that nothing has really changed and that all the same complaints being made by Republicans still exist.

Sean Davis breaks some of the most important parts, not the least of which is that this isn’t even an actual impeachment resolution. Instead, it references the previous investigation, which doesn’t even legally exist.

That aside, the details within the resolution paint the same picture that existed prior to its existence.

Take the section on transcripts for example.

Someone point out to me how this changes anything.

The chair is Adam Schiff.

The resolution gives him sole authority to release transcripts. All this does is legitimize his selective leaking. Now he can release excerpts as he sees fit without having to shovel them through CNN. If a testimony helps Donald Trump, he can simply hold it back and no doubt he will (I have a story tomorrow coming about Schiff instructing witnesses not to answer the questions of Republican members).

But maybe he’s giving subpoena power to the minority party like Republicans did during the Clinton impeachment investigation? Nope. Adam Schiff once again garners full authority to veto any requested witnesses or subpoenas and the only appeal is to the entire committee, which is majority Democrat and will always vote to back up Schiff.

Again, nothing has changed.

Nearly every single anti-transparency dynamic Republicans have pointed out still exists, just with prettier language around it. This resolution is window dressing. It’s an attempt to shovel fodder to the media, knowing they will now proclaim all Republican concerns moot. The fact that some conservatives are going along with the gambit is disappointing.

Republicans aren’t asking for a lot. We simply want to see the transcripts. We want to be able to judge the contradictions, context, and any possible evidence for ourselves. Adam Schiff being the arbiter of that is not acceptable and as long as that dynamic exists, this inquiry will continue to be a sham.

Full article here

Posted in News Blog: Current Events

Resolution Introduced In House To Expel Nancy Pelosi

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., talks to reporters during her weekly news conference, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 7, 2018. After several questions about President Donald Trump and his policies, Pelosi responded: The President said he was going to drain the swamp. He has become the swamp. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Rep. Ralph Abraham (R-LA) has introduced a resolution to expel Pelosi from the House.

House Democrats may be trying to ram through impeachment in secret with an anonymous whistleblower. 

But although Republicans are outnumbered in the House, they are fighting back. 

First, they filed a resolution to censure Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA). The resolution has 61 co-sponsors at last count, with prominent names including the House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA).

Now, they’re also fighting back against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) who allowed this travesty to get so far. 

Rep. Ralph Abraham (R-LA) has introduced a resolution to expel Pelosi from the House. 

From Fox News: 

“Nancy Pelosi’s vicious crusade against our lawfully-elected President is nothing more than a politically-motivated witch hunt and it must be stopped,” Abraham said in a statement. “She has disgraced the people’s House and weaponized the Speaker’s gavel for her party’s political gain.”

Abraham added: “House Democrats spent nearly three years obsessed with election meddling only to dwarf any such efforts with their own deceitful plan to nullify the 2016 election and prevent President Trump from winning in 2020. I have introduced a resolution calling for her to be expelled from the House and for the Speaker’s Office to be vacated.”

The White House is fighting back as well. 

They refused to let the U.S. EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland testify before a House panel and they sent a stern letter back to the House, making it clear they regarded the inquiry as illegitimate and unconstitutional.

“I would love to send Ambassador Sondland, a really good man and great American, to testify, but unfortunately he would be testifying before a totally compromised kangaroo court, where Republican’s rights have been taken away, and true facts are not allowed out for the public to see,” Trump wrote on Twitter. ….

@AdamSchiff of course immediately claimed the refusal constituted obstruction. 

But Trump chastised Democrats calling what they were doing to the country “unthinkable.” 

“It’s lucky that I’m the president,” he declared. “A lot of people said very few people could handle it. I sort of thrive on it,” Trump said Monday at the White House. “You can’t impeach a president for doing a great job. This is a scam.”

It’s about damn time the GOP is fighting back @savecalifornianow

Posted in SaveCali

Shawn Steele: GOP National for California, Explains Ballot Harvesting, Trump and; the Immigrant Influence on our Elections

IF U DO NOTHING ELSE TODAY WATCH THIS VIDEO AND BE SHOCKED A THE FRAUD THAT HAPPENED IN OUR STATE UNDER OUR NOSE!

Ballot harvesting in california voter fraud

What is ‘ballot harvesting’ and how was it used in California elections?

“Ballot harvesting” is political jargon for a practice in which organized workers or volunteers collect absentee ballots from certain voters and drop them off at a polling place or election office. Coined by California Republicans, the term carries a negative connotation to suggest improprieties and even election fraud. The conservative site Townhall.com called it the California Democrats’ “latest election-stealing tool.” The San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board took a different view, calling it “a sinister-sounding way of saying their opponents turned out more votes than they did” in one recent editorial.

Is it legal?

Yes.

In 2016, Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law a change to Section 3017 of the Election Code that allows any person to collect a mail-in ballot from voters and turn in the mail ballot to a polling place or the registrar’s office. Prior law restricted the practice to just relatives of or those living in the same household as the voter.

While critics decry it as the practice of a “banana republic,” proponents of the change say it allows more eligible citizens to participate in elections across California. Here’s how the legislation spells out the practice:

(a) All vote by mail ballots cast under this division shall be voted on or before the day of the election. After marking the ballot, the vote by mail voter shall do any of the following: (1) return the ballot by mail or in person to the elections official from whom it came, (2) return the ballot in person to a member of a precinct board at a polling place within the jurisdiction, or (3) return the ballot to the elections official from whom it came at a vote by mail ballot drop-off location, if provided pursuant to Section 3025. However, a vote by mail voter who is unable to return the ballot may designate any person to return the ballot to the elections official from whom it came or to the precinct board at a polling place within the jurisdiction. The ballot must, however, be received by either the elections official from whom it came or the precinct board before the close of the polls on election day.

Democrats Passed Ballot Harvesting Law Legalizing Voter Fraud and Stole the Elections While Republicans Allow It

Democrats in California quietly passed a law allowing ballot harvesting in 2016, which allows party workers to go door-to-door and offering to deliver mail-in ballots on behalf of the voter.  California lost 7 out of 14 Republican House seats in this election cycle.  Ballot harvesting is illegal in most states. In Texas, New York and Pennsylvania they arrest people for ballot harvesting.  Conservative Orange County turned all blue after and unprecedented 250,000 Election Day vote-by-mail dropoff ballots were produced.  Candidates who won on Election Day later lost their races to Democrats.  The Democrats don’t even hide their blatant voter fraud anymore – they just pass laws to make election fixing legal and the Republican party just sits back and allows it.

The Communists Democrats in California quietly passed legislature in 2016 allowing ballot harvesting.

Very few people took notice when far left Governor Jerry Brown signed the changes in AB1921 into law two years ago. As a result, California lost 7 of its 14 Republican House seats this election cycle. Ballot harvesting is illegal in most states. In Texas, New York and Pennsylvania they arrest people for ballot harvesting.

Orange County, traditionally a conservative enclave in Southern California turned all blue after Democrats found hundreds of thousands of votes post election day. Republicans such as Mimi Walters, Dana Rohrabacher and Young Kim were all ahead election night only to lose their races after late ballots were counted.

The amount of mail-in ballots counted in Orange County were unprecedented – a whopping 250,000 ballots were produced in OC as a result of the new “ballot harvesting” law.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported: In Orange County alone, where every House seat went Democratic, “the number of Election Day vote-by-mail dropoffs was unprecedented — over 250,000,” Fred Whitaker, chairman of the county Republican Party, said in a note to supporters. “This is a direct result of ballot harvesting allowed under California law for the first time. That directly caused the switch from being ahead on election night to losing two weeks later.”

The voting system in California is so bad that a Democrat in California’s 21st district who was down by 6.4% on election night ended up winning three weeks later. The Democrats don’t even hide their blatant voter fraud anymore – they just pass laws to make election fixing legal and the Republican party just sits back and allows it.

The Daily Caller has more on this outrageous practice used by Democrats. The results drew the attention of House Speaker Paul Ryan.

“California just defies logic to me,” said Ryan at a Washington Post live event. “We were only down 26 seats the night of the election, and three weeks later, we lost basically every California contested race. This election system they have — I can’t begin to understand what ‘ballot harvesting’ is.” (RELATED: Bloomberg Drops Millions On California Dems Ahead Of Midterm Elections)

The stunning turnaround in California, of all states, can be attributed to several factors, as conservative critics like The Federalist’s Bre Payton wrote, but the most significant of those seemed to be the practice of “ballot harvesting.”

Passed as a barely noticed change in the state’s vote by mail procedures in 2016 and signed by then-Governor Jerry Brown, California’s AB 1921 allows voters to give any third party — not just a relative or someone living in the same household, as was previously the law — to collect and turn in anyone else’s completed ballot.

The amount of mail-in ballots counted in Orange County were unprecedented – a whopping 250,000 ballots were produced in OC as a result of the new “ballot harvesting” law.

Recall the crooked governor! Go to http://www.takecaback.org and download your petition to recall Gavin Newsome.

Download here

Posted in News Blog: Current Events

Here’s How Much the ‘Whistleblower’ Really Knew About Trump’s Phone Call Succinct analysis puts a complicated story — and Pelosi’s Crazed claims

deep state recall Gavin Newsome save California impeachment Trump

The “whistleblower,” it turns out, never heard Trump’s call himself/herself and is relying ONLY on reports from others.

Brit Hume, a longtime political reporter and currently a senior political analyst for the Fox News Channel, summed up exactly what’s going on in terms of the so-called whistleblower who has ignited a firestorm on Capitol Hill — and who may or may not know what President Donald Trump said on the phone to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky back in late July of this year.

That scenario raises far more questions than Democratic members of Congress are willing to admit — but one that Republicans have reminded them of and will, repeatedly.

It raises questions about who those “reporters” of Trump’s phone call might be, what their political leaning is, exactly (one can imagine), and how and under what circumstances they fed information to the “whistleblower.”The “whistleblower,” it turns out, never heard Trump’s call himself/herself and is relying only on reports from others.

Hume sent out a tweet yesterday that nails what’s going on. Check out his message here:

“As of Wednesday morning, when the Ukraine phone call transcript was released, the public knew more about what transpired on the call than the whistleblower knew when he/she filed the complaint.”

That’s right. Trump released the transcript of his phone call — which had been protected by executive privilege — in the interest of being transparent.

The “whistleblower,” it turns out, never heard Trump’s call himself/herself and is relying only on reports from others.

Yet Democrats are seizing on it and interpreting it as they choose to and as they see fit.

Now, an unnamed Ukrainian official said Kiev was not made aware the U.S. had suspended security funds until a month after Trump’s call with Zelensky, which raises questions about the whistleblower’s account and Democrats’ vehement arguments that there was a quid pro quo for such aid, as Fox News pointed out in a new piece.

The official told The New York Times, as Fox News noted, that Zelensky’s administration was unaware of the aid issue until a month after Trump’s July 25 phone call in which he discussed Joe Biden and Biden’s son, Hunter.

“The whistleblower complaint — citing U.S. officials — claimed that officials in Kiev knew that the military aid could be in jeopardy in early August, but the whistleblower admitted to not knowing ‘how or when they learned of it,’” as Fox News noted.

Zelensky said this week in New York City, during a joint press conference with Trump, that he never felt pressured to investigate the Bidens.

Yet Democrats are seizing on it and interpreting it as they choose to and as they see fit.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) began a new push in the House toward impeachment proceedings this week — saying on Thursday that she’s being “prayerful” about it — but Democrats are not holding a roll call vote to authorize the effort.

She also accused Trump and his administration of a “cover-up.”

Meanwhile, Democratic members of the progressive “squad” want Trump out of office now — raising questions about whether Pelosi is indeed being pushed by some of the most Left-leaning members of the House. Members of Congress are about to head home to their congressional districts for the next two weeks — during which they’ll be making the case to constituents for the immediate removal of Trump, even though he was elected by the American people.

The squad has power, left-leaning media outlets claim — for “when they speak, everybody listens,” according to a piece in The New York Times recently.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), for one, argued the recently released transcript of Trump’s phone call with the Ukraine president indicated the conversation was “worse than we thought” — and she accused the president of betraying the nation.

“I think we have to hold this president accountable,” she told reporters, “and protect our democracy.”

She also said, “I’m pretty confidence that we are not going to see this process dragged along,” noting she’s expecting swift action.

Here’s her recent tweet on the issue: THE CLOWN IDIOT SHE IS AND HER STUPID DRIBBLE

That scenario raises far more questions than Democratic members of Congress are willing to admit — but one that Republicans have reminded them of and will, repeatedly.It raises questions about who those “reporters” of Trump’s phone call might be, what their political leaning is, exactly (one can imagine), and how and under what circumstances they fed information to the “whistleblower.”

“Either the president does not know the weight of his words or he does not care about ethics or his constitutional responsibilities,” she also said in a statement on Wednesday obtained and shared by Fox News.

“The transcript and the Justice Department’s acting in a rogue fashion in being complicit in the president’s lawlessness confirm the need for an impeachment inquiry. Clearly, the Congress must act.”

But that’s not all. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) joined Ocasio-Cortez in calling for Trump’s impeachment, saying the transcript alone was proof Congress should pursue the process.

Yet neither of them mention the questionable dealings of former Vice President Joe Biden regarding his role in having a prosecutor fired — someone who was looking into corruption in Ukraine.

Joe Biden acknowledged last year on camera that, when he was vice president, he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings — where Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s son, was on the board.

Shokin himself had separately been accused of corruption.

 WHERE IS THE INVESTIGATION OF THAT — AS TRUMP’S PERSONAL LAWYER RUDY GIULIANI AND OTHERS HAVE WONDERED?

All of this is why it’s no surprise that Trump on Thursday morning called the current investigation “another witch hunt … Really a disgrace, a terrible thing for our country”?

THE GOP NEEDS TO GET OFF THEIR ASS AND FIGHT FOR THIS POTUS

Posted in SaveCali

Make a Complaint Against The Corrupt, Deep State Politicians!

Adam Schiff impeachment hearing traitor trump

The Office of Congressional Ethics Is a Non Partisan Website You Can Upload Complaints Against Politicians

Thank you for your interest in submitting information to the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE).

The OCE is an independent, non-partisan entity charged with reviewing allegations of misconduct against Members, officers, and staff of the United States House of Representatives.

The OCE will accept and review information concerning allegations within its jurisdiction. Please note that a submission of information does not automatically result in an investigation. The decision to begin an investigation (preliminary review) lies solely with the OCE Board. Further, the OCE is not able to provide information about whether the Board has authorized a review or whether the OCE has conducted an investigation related to the information you submit.

You may submit public input via email, phone, or by completing the form below.

I submitted one on Adam Schiff Today. I copied it below:

WHO AND WHY: 

“Mr. Adam Schiff lied during a hearing of the House Intelligence Committee questioning of the DNI over the Ukraine Whistleblower scandal. It was well documented he lied about what the transcript said as he changed the words said by the President. Then he called it a parody? There is no room for Parody during a fact gathering hearing. 

He has been lying to the American Public since before the Mueller Probe came out. Claiming he has never before seen evidence of the president colluding with Russia to change the outcome of the 2016 election. He spends more time on TV than he does in office and he works for the American People not the other way around. “

COMPLAINT: 

“He has used millions of our tax dollars trying to pin a crime on President Trump. He is not helping his district (which is next to mine in California) He is wasting our tax dollars on his personal vendetta and I am sick of it.”

WHAT CRIMES:

Tax Dollar Theft: He has wasted millions trying to pin a crime on President Trump. 

Fraud and Treason 

Fraud as a Criminal Offense

Certain types of fraud are classified as criminal offenses, mainly if the perpetrator is involved in theft under false pretenses. Like civil wrongs, certain elements must be in place for fraud to fall under the category of a criminal offense.

Intentional deception by false pretense with the intent to convince the victim to part with money or property.

The belief in the deception by the victim, who actually parts with the money or property under the false pretenses.

The perpetrator keeping, or intending to keep, the money or property in question.

EVIDENCE OF WHERE IT WAS DONE

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/26/adam-schiff-dni-director-joe-maguire-you-stood-sil/

WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS: 

The entire American Public he did this on live TV. Fox News, CNN, Twitter any of the above.